By Wilson Majoni

In Zimbabwe, the push for justice for the key population is no longer confined to courtrooms—it is unfolding in the pages of newspapers, the airwaves of radio stations, and the feeds of digital outlets.
Media holds immense influence over how laws are interpreted and how reform is received.
Yet coverage of legal advocacy often focuses on controversy rather than courage. When community members challenge discriminatory laws, the media’s instinct is often to capture opposition—not to profile activists as strategic thinkers or citizens asserting constitutional rights.
This imbalance must change. Journalism must not only document reform—it must contextualize it.
The Reporting Guide, developed through freelance media engagements, offers clear direction on how to responsibly report on legal milestones. It advocates for coverage that centers community agency and exposes systems rather than stigmatizing identities.
Legal stories deserve depth. They require historical context, sociopolitical analysis, and personal testimonies. When journalists approach legal reporting with curiosity and compassion, they do more than inform—they shape possibility.
